The new guards has accused the old guards of promoting homosexuality.
I feel that is seriously overplayed by the new guards, as not condoning homosexuality does not mean promote. You see, as long as the old guards does not show any sign of resentment towards homosexuality, any hard liner who opposed homosexuality would take it as that the old guards promote sexuality.
Religious people, especially one that condones homosexuality, takes it upon themselves to be “agents of change for lord” to right this wrong. While they would feel good that they are doing these to help people, they are too dumbed by groundless believes to notice that their behavior reeks of selfishness and elitism. Who are they to decide if homosexuality is good or not? Any religion that does not believe in giving people a choice, and constantly judges other people, is a religion I would not want to have anything to do with.
AWARE is a group that exist for ALL women. As an extension of that, all women, regardless of their sexuality orientation (be it with man, with another woman, with dogs, with cows, with plant, with usb cables, with bottles, etc) have the basic right of seeking help from AWARE.
From these leaked emails we see that the sudden influx of new members and the consequential election of new ex-co and president, was a result of women in a certain church wanting to stand down on the so-called homosexuality activity. Would this imply that under the new leadership, would AWARE limit their definition of “women” to the groundless rules in a dated religion?
What would then become of a secular, all-inclusive group for women?
Related posts:
Loading ...